Council Tax-An unworkable idea
Council Tax-An unworkable idea
Or at least I think it is.
I wondered if a scheme could be developed where people traded their labour or skills to offset council tax? The idea being to perform tasks that would normally be done by council employees or create new tasks or services that would benefit the city.
This would engender more respect for the council and its property, benefit the environment, create a sense of well-being and so on. Maybe it could cross over into the health service?
On the other hand it may prove a nightmare with the unions. Is this too far fetched.
I wondered if a scheme could be developed where people traded their labour or skills to offset council tax? The idea being to perform tasks that would normally be done by council employees or create new tasks or services that would benefit the city.
This would engender more respect for the council and its property, benefit the environment, create a sense of well-being and so on. Maybe it could cross over into the health service?
On the other hand it may prove a nightmare with the unions. Is this too far fetched.
.....ambition makes you look pretty ugly
Re: Council Tax-An unworkable idea
I've always fancied a shot at brain surgery.Porty wrote:Maybe it could cross over into the health service?
Where do I sign up?
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
-
Cleopas
I'm in favour of a local income tax. Those that earn an income should pay for local services. It's unreasonable to expect those on fixed or low incomes to pay.
I'm dubious as to whether the council tax encourages local accountability which is one of the arguments put forward in its favour.
The real solution would either be a local sales tax (as in the USA) or just fund local services via block grants to councils from central government with the money from general taxation.
I'm dubious as to whether the council tax encourages local accountability which is one of the arguments put forward in its favour.
The real solution would either be a local sales tax (as in the USA) or just fund local services via block grants to councils from central government with the money from general taxation.
Last edited by ali on 12 Nov 2006, 22:39, edited 1 time in total.
Same here, seems the fairest system to me. I know it's been said that it's too complicated and expensive to run - but I don't see why.ali wrote:I'm in favour of a local income tax. Those that earn an income should pay for local services. It's unreasonable to expect those on fixed or low incomes to pay.
I was at University back in the days when there was a grant system and was amazed at some of the fairly well off folk I knew who either got full grants or had very small parental contributions levied. It often came down to Daddy having a good accountant.seanie wrote: I'd lean towards a local income tax.
IMO any sort of means tested scheme would be expensive to administer and would not necessarily result in an equitable system.
What do you mean by "real"?
The mechanism for accountability is the democratic process whereby the electorate periodically pass judgement on their local politicians. That's unlikely to change regardless of how LA's are funded.
But as things stand raising (a small) part of revenue locally offers a degree of local flexibility.
If central government dispersed all the cash they'd be the ones deciding how much to disperse and local variations, concerns and choices would be more constrained.
The mechanism for accountability is the democratic process whereby the electorate periodically pass judgement on their local politicians. That's unlikely to change regardless of how LA's are funded.
But as things stand raising (a small) part of revenue locally offers a degree of local flexibility.
If central government dispersed all the cash they'd be the ones deciding how much to disperse and local variations, concerns and choices would be more constrained.
Income tax is a pretty straightforward tax to administer. It's already a major part of our current tax system. Local income tax would require variation in the tax deductible depending on where people live.Marya wrote:IMO any sort of means tested scheme would be expensive to administer and would not necessarily result in an equitable system.
That doesn't strike me as a significant administrative burden.