Council Tax-An unworkable idea

General discussion - "gossip and tittle tattle"
Post Reply
User avatar
Porty
Posts: 8514
Joined: 08 Jun 2004, 14:30
Location: Organic Market

Council Tax-An unworkable idea

Post by Porty » 12 Nov 2006, 17:08

Or at least I think it is.

I wondered if a scheme could be developed where people traded their labour or skills to offset council tax? The idea being to perform tasks that would normally be done by council employees or create new tasks or services that would benefit the city.

This would engender more respect for the council and its property, benefit the environment, create a sense of well-being and so on. Maybe it could cross over into the health service?

On the other hand it may prove a nightmare with the unions. Is this too far fetched.
.....ambition makes you look pretty ugly

seanie
Posts: 2313
Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 20:43
Location: Brighton Place

Re: Council Tax-An unworkable idea

Post by seanie » 12 Nov 2006, 18:08

Porty wrote:Maybe it could cross over into the health service?
I've always fancied a shot at brain surgery.

Where do I sign up?

User avatar
Bob Jefferson
Posts: 6212
Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
Location: Planet Porty
Contact:

Post by Bob Jefferson » 12 Nov 2006, 18:13

In exchange for not paying Council Tax, I would like to help run a community website.

Cleopas

Post by Cleopas » 12 Nov 2006, 19:01

If I didn't have to pay Council Tax, I'd help by being a removal person, getting ugly people off the beach in Summer.

User avatar
ali
Posts: 846
Joined: 15 Jun 2003, 09:15

Post by ali » 12 Nov 2006, 19:07

I'm in favour of a local income tax. Those that earn an income should pay for local services. It's unreasonable to expect those on fixed or low incomes to pay.

I'm dubious as to whether the council tax encourages local accountability which is one of the arguments put forward in its favour.

The real solution would either be a local sales tax (as in the USA) or just fund local services via block grants to councils from central government with the money from general taxation.
Last edited by ali on 12 Nov 2006, 22:39, edited 1 time in total.

seanie
Posts: 2313
Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 20:43
Location: Brighton Place

Post by seanie » 12 Nov 2006, 19:30

About 70% of LA revenue comes from central government. If it were all funded that way there'd be even less local accountability.

I'd lean towards a local income tax. Sales tax is regressive.

User avatar
bearcub
Posts: 1057
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 22:51
Location: Marlborough Street

Post by bearcub » 12 Nov 2006, 20:38

ali wrote:I'm in favour of a local income tax. Those that earn an income should pay for local services. It's unreasonable to expect those on fixed or low incomes to pay.
Same here, seems the fairest system to me. I know it's been said that it's too complicated and expensive to run - but I don't see why. :?

User avatar
Maria
Posts: 4795
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 19:41
Location: Portobello
Contact:

Post by Maria » 12 Nov 2006, 21:31

seanie wrote: I'd lean towards a local income tax.
I was at University back in the days when there was a grant system and was amazed at some of the fairly well off folk I knew who either got full grants or had very small parental contributions levied. It often came down to Daddy having a good accountant.

IMO any sort of means tested scheme would be expensive to administer and would not necessarily result in an equitable system.

User avatar
ali
Posts: 846
Joined: 15 Jun 2003, 09:15

Post by ali » 12 Nov 2006, 22:42

seanie wrote:About 70% of LA revenue comes from central government. If it were all funded that way there'd be even less local accountability.
What evidence is there that the council tax delivers real accountability?

seanie
Posts: 2313
Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 20:43
Location: Brighton Place

Post by seanie » 12 Nov 2006, 23:51

What do you mean by "real"?

The mechanism for accountability is the democratic process whereby the electorate periodically pass judgement on their local politicians. That's unlikely to change regardless of how LA's are funded.

But as things stand raising (a small) part of revenue locally offers a degree of local flexibility.

If central government dispersed all the cash they'd be the ones deciding how much to disperse and local variations, concerns and choices would be more constrained.

seanie
Posts: 2313
Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 20:43
Location: Brighton Place

Post by seanie » 13 Nov 2006, 00:32

Marya wrote:IMO any sort of means tested scheme would be expensive to administer and would not necessarily result in an equitable system.
Income tax is a pretty straightforward tax to administer. It's already a major part of our current tax system. Local income tax would require variation in the tax deductible depending on where people live.

That doesn't strike me as a significant administrative burden.

Post Reply