Earlier this week I spotted a young mother pushing her baby in a pram. It looked like one of those designs where you can put the cot in either a forward or reverse position. In her case it was turned so that it was facing away from her. She was taking her baby for a walk but was unable to make eye contact or, presumably, any other form of communication. She wouldn't be able to see if her baby had been sick or was otherwise distressed unless alerted by the sound of crying.
It seemed unnatural. Surely, any parent would want to face their child and have some interaction as they walked? My wife agreed but told me that forward facing designs were very popular.
And then this morning I read this:
Forward-facing buggies 'can cause mental harm to babies'
Pramonition?
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
Re: Pramonition?
Bob Jefferson wrote: It seemed unnatural. Surely, any parent would want to face their child and have some interaction as they walked?
Not if the baby is unspeakably ugly and getting it out for a hurl in this front facing buggy gives it's poor Mum a bit of respite from looking upon it's hideous visage.
Bit unfair to inflict the horror on the public at large, mind you.
- SoupDragon
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02
- Stray NO.666
- Posts: 93
- Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 11:26
- Location: Porty on the prom
- Contact:
- SoupDragon
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02