Replacement of HLR / Seafield / Portobello Rd Roundabout
I wonder if we'll ever see the accident statistics of the new traffic light implementation. I'm sure this incident isn't the first one.
I have a feeling that these incidents don't count though as the traffics lights have not been fully commisioned yet.
Probably little comfort to the cyclist in the hospital now, that the new junction may be safer once it is eventually finished.
I have a feeling that these incidents don't count though as the traffics lights have not been fully commisioned yet.
Probably little comfort to the cyclist in the hospital now, that the new junction may be safer once it is eventually finished.
If people have reported the incidents to the Police or the Council, or indeed if someone called 999 asking for an ambulance, then there would be a written record of the accident held by one of the statutory organisations. Following that line of thinking, if the stats were not published im sure they would be made available if a suitable FOI request was processed (asking for the states obv).Grunk wrote:I wonder if we'll ever see the accident statistics of the new traffic light implementation. I'm sure this incident isn't the first one.
Although, for the unreported incidents then there would be no official record kept so it would be unknown.
This is kind of my point...BeachBum wrote: If the stats were not published im sure they would be made available if a suitable FOI request was processed (asking for the states obv).
The council seem happy to roll out the stats when they support whatever plan it is they want to undertake. I doubt they are so keen on publicising the ones that show their ineptitude or poor strategy.
You've got to remember that the only statistics you can really trust are the ones you've made up yourself.
BTW, how does one go about filing an FOI request?
Someone we know was at the scene more or less as it happened and he thought the driver was possibly blinded by the sun.wangi wrote: There are two obvious situations (as a cyclist and driver) that I can think of at the junction of HLR and BR heading north that could easily cause this with no fault of the cyclist.
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!
Note: Im not trying to go off topic, this answer is in direct relation to someone asking how they go about getting information on the number of accidents/incidents at the former roundabout site.
Here are the direct links for the bodies which I gave mention to.
Lothian and Borders Police - FOI information
City of Edinburgh Council - FOI information
Scottish Ambulance Service - FOI info
Its fairly obvious that to find the number of reported incidents you are going to need to submit requests to some different bodies to get a complete answer. Remember to be very specific in your request so you get the best possible answers back.
In would suggest visiting the website of the body you wish to place the request with.Grunk wrote: BTW, how does one go about filing an FOI request?
Here are the direct links for the bodies which I gave mention to.
Lothian and Borders Police - FOI information
City of Edinburgh Council - FOI information
Scottish Ambulance Service - FOI info
Its fairly obvious that to find the number of reported incidents you are going to need to submit requests to some different bodies to get a complete answer. Remember to be very specific in your request so you get the best possible answers back.
http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/internet/co ... nformationGrunk wrote:BTW, how does one go about filing an FOI request?
Perhaps Grunk just wants to know out of curiosity.Porty wrote:Thing is- what are you going to do with the information once you have set it free? Let's say there's been 15 accidents linked to the krr roadworks . you have collated the data,factored in an additional percentage of unreported incidents, now what?
The information is mainly for my curiosity, I want to see if the traffic light system really does prove to be safer, as this was the main reason for the change.
It will also go in my reservoir of information, that I quote in my various communications with the transport authorities. I have written to TIE, Sestrans and the Council a few times already, asking for information and justification for the various traffic measures that have been implemented.
I have yet to receive a reply from any of them.
I'm sorry I didn't post this reply earlier, but I was busy doing other stuff and not looking at this forum. But at least you've gotten a response, in considerably less time than you would get one from any of the authorities.
It will also go in my reservoir of information, that I quote in my various communications with the transport authorities. I have written to TIE, Sestrans and the Council a few times already, asking for information and justification for the various traffic measures that have been implemented.
I have yet to receive a reply from any of them.
I'm sorry I didn't post this reply earlier, but I was busy doing other stuff and not looking at this forum. But at least you've gotten a response, in considerably less time than you would get one from any of the authorities.
I was getting a refresher course today in regards to the Councils CCTV policies & procedures and a quick refresher in working practice & the law.BeachBum wrote:I see they have started puting in the CCTV for the new junction at the former roundabout.
One of the chaps from the CMF were saying that the camera at the former roundabout is either already removed or about to be. It was decided that it was badly placed.
I actually think that is one of the street cameras part funded by Lothian Buses (to be partially used for traffic monitoring).
Porty Roundabout
Get tomorrows Evening News and catch up on the latest shambles regarding the roundabout !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Porty Roundabout
Just what is the latest shambles like?westbank wrote:Get tomorrows Evening News and catch up on the latest shambles regarding the roundabout !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
I fully agree with those who feel that the roadworks have compromised pedestrian safety and convenience to an unacceptable level, but I also believe that the new junction will ultimately prove to be safer. Here, as a reminder, are the shocking stats over the last 5 years:
There have been 18 accidents at the King’s Road roundabout over the last five years, involving 20 casualties. Of these, four were cyclists, three were motorcyclists and two were pedestrians. There was one fatality involving a cyclist in 2003, and three serious injuries to cyclists or motorcyclists.
I don't think anyone has a problem with replacing/renovating a junction to establish a safer and more efficient transport infrastructure.
I think it's more that the implementation of the changes could have been accomplished better by a dozen untrained monkeys. It should really have been completed on time, on budget, without adversely affecting local businesses or compromising the safety of the public during the disruption.
I think it's more that the implementation of the changes could have been accomplished better by a dozen untrained monkeys. It should really have been completed on time, on budget, without adversely affecting local businesses or compromising the safety of the public during the disruption.
hear hear!Grunk wrote:I don't think anyone has a problem with replacing/renovating a junction to establish a safer and more efficient transport infrastructure.
I think it's more that the implementation of the changes could have been accomplished better by a dozen untrained monkeys. It should really have been completed on time, on budget, without adversely affecting local businesses or compromising the safety of the public during the disruption.
The whole fiasco has been a shocking example of the ineptness of the Council to plan and implement change. Is it any wonder that the tram scheme is going so badly wrong????
Re: Porty Roundabout
Are you on about this?westbank wrote:Get tomorrows Evening News and catch up on the latest shambles regarding the roundabout !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Evening News 23/2/09 - Rogue road sign declaring highway closed proves a bar to pub's profits.
The owner of the Forth View complaining about a sign put up by Council contractors. I wonder why he felt the need to have it featured in the evening news? I wonder if he made contact with the Council first and gave them the opportunity to discuss the matter with the contractor before going to the evening news for a bit of Council bashing.
Re: Porty Roundabout
Cllr Child, mail shot 24/2/09 wrote:We Need Safer Temporary Pedestrian FacilitiesI asked the Council’s head of transport why there is not a pedestrian phase fitted to temporary traffic lights, like we have on most of the crossings at the Kings Road/Seafield Road works. He said he is going to take it up with his professional colleagues, nationwide, to progress this with manufacturers.
Roadworks Bound to Finish by 3 April
In addition to his apology for the mistakes made with the Kings Road/Seafield Road junction roadworks, Marshall Poulton told me at Committee he was ‘very confident’ that the work would finish by 3 April. I pressed him at Committee for compensation for those who had been affected, as commuters and local businesses, as a consequence of the Council’s mistakes. He said he would work closely with colleagues in corporate communications and economic development to put in a package of measures to help trade pick up after the works were finished which would boost local shops.
Beach Bum, I would guess that the answer to your question asking if the Forthview bar contacted the council to talk about the sign would probably be no. Given that the Forthview blatantly flaunts the smoking ban by allowing people to smoke in the conservatory attached to the bar then the last thing the owner wants is a visit from the council. I like the quieter High Street that the roadworks have brought but it is a bit of a horror trying to negotiate the turn into HLR when on a bike. The finished part from Kings Road to Kwik Fit looks wonderful and it will be a shame when all the cars and busses spoil it.
Prom cycling for all.
It's a pain in the neck! Cars are queued halfway up to Piershill, the buses are overtaking them in the bus lane and then cutting in when they get to the lights! This means only one or two cars are getting through the lights at a time. I was stuck in this nonsense for 20 minutes the other night!
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!
Which lights? The ones at the site of the former roundabout?Epykat wrote:It's a pain in the neck! Cars are queued halfway up to Piershill, the buses are overtaking them in the bus lane and then cutting in when they get to the lights! This means only one or two cars are getting through the lights at a time. I was stuck in this nonsense for 20 minutes the other night!
- Pal of Porty
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
- Location: Old Folks Home
- Contact:
That's the Council's main point of the scheme!Epykat wrote:It's a pain in the neck! Cars are queued halfway up to Piershill, the buses are overtaking them in the bus lane and then cutting in when they get to the lights! This means only one or two cars are getting through the lights at a time. I was stuck in this nonsense for 20 minutes the other night!
Justice delayed is justice denied.
Seems like the bus priority is already working (fair enough public transport should have priority).
I wonder how well the scheme will work when the traffic lights are controlling 5 full flows as opposed to the 2.5 on offer just now.
Shame the public transport routes aren't very useful for the majority of Edinburgh's commuters.
I wonder how well the scheme will work when the traffic lights are controlling 5 full flows as opposed to the 2.5 on offer just now.
Shame the public transport routes aren't very useful for the majority of Edinburgh's commuters.
Actually I had a look at the last census results, which makes the Halcrow report seem rather dubious.
Generally the Transport (bus) routes take a slow path to the city centre. Meaning that anyone who doesn't work in the city centre (about 30%) of the population has to go in then out again, or drive, which until recently was much faster.
So on a busy day, it could be 45mins-1hr to the city centre. 10 20 mins waiting for another bus then 45 mins out again.
It seems like public transport is only being improved relative to car travel (i.e. by making car travel worse).
Also it should be noted that around 20% of all routes go to Leith using (again until recently) The most appropriate road for bus/car co-existence due to it's width (leith walk).
Also one of the major reasons for not taking the south sub any further was that you would just move commuters from the buses to the trains. But this argument doesn't appear to hold true for moving commuters from buses to trams.
Generally the Transport (bus) routes take a slow path to the city centre. Meaning that anyone who doesn't work in the city centre (about 30%) of the population has to go in then out again, or drive, which until recently was much faster.
So on a busy day, it could be 45mins-1hr to the city centre. 10 20 mins waiting for another bus then 45 mins out again.
It seems like public transport is only being improved relative to car travel (i.e. by making car travel worse).
Also it should be noted that around 20% of all routes go to Leith using (again until recently) The most appropriate road for bus/car co-existence due to it's width (leith walk).
Also one of the major reasons for not taking the south sub any further was that you would just move commuters from the buses to the trains. But this argument doesn't appear to hold true for moving commuters from buses to trams.
over the last 25 years I've noticed that people are moving farther and farther away from their place of work. Not so long ago, it was commonplace to have people driving in from Fife - now we see people driving in from Perth everyday.Grunk wrote:Seems like the bus priority is already working (fair enough public transport should have priority).
I wonder how well the scheme will work when the traffic lights are controlling 5 full flows as opposed to the 2.5 on offer just now.
Shame the public transport routes aren't very useful for the majority of Edinburgh's commuters.
And most of these people drive to work - adding to the congestion on city roads. ASk them to consider not driving and you'll be told that while they agree with the idea - it's just not practical for them.
Bus routes within the city are substantially unchanged from teh 70s when there were a lot people driving to work.
The main reason people drive to work is because it is convenient for them and they can't be btoehred to make the change to public transport! I have a 15 minute walk to the nearest bus stop giving access to the city - but I don't view that as an obstacle to using public transport. Walking is a cheap and effective way of keeping fit, after all.
Sadly the cyclist has died from his injuries. Police are still appealing for witnesses:wangi wrote: This happened today:Lothian & Borders Police wrote:46-year-old cyclist seriously injured in collision
A cyclist is in a critical condition in hospital following a serious road collision that happened in Edinburgh earlier today (Wednesday).
The incident happened at around 10am, on Sir Harry Lauder Road, at the junction with Baileyfield Road.
The 46-year-old cyclist was travelling westwards on Sir Harry Lauder Road when he was in collision with a blue and grey Ford Escort Van.
...
L/Lothian & Borders Police wrote:FATAL ROAD COLLISION, EDINBURGH - MAN NAMED.
Victim of road collision on Sir Harry Lauder Road from Portobello area
A 46-year-old man who was seriously injured in a road collision that happened in Edinburgh last month has died as a result of his injuries.
Thomas McKay, from Inchview Terrace in the Portobello area of the Capital, passed away at the Western General Hospital on Wednesday (March 4).
He had been receiving treatment for head injuries sustained in the collision on Harry Lauder Road on Wednesday, February 11.
The incident happened at around 10am, at the junction with Baileyfield Road. Mr McKay was riding his bicycle when he was in a collision with a blue and grey Ford Escort Van.
He was taken immediately to the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary before being transferred to the Western General.
Police are reiterating their appeal for anyone who witnessed the incident who hasn't yet got in touch to come forward.
Anyone with any information should contact Lothian and Borders Police on 0131 311 3131, or Crimestoppers in confidence and complete anonymity on 0800 555 111.
From the email newsletter of Cllr Child.
Cllr Child, email shot 30-3-09 wrote:
Roadworks Will Not be Finished by April 3 – but April 13….
The latest on the road works is that they will NOT be finished by April 3, despite the head of transport’s previous confidence that it would. I have an email response from Marshall Poulton on Friday 27 March in which he says: “I can give you an absolute assurance that this junction will be opened up to traffic with the new signal control in operation by week commencing 13 April. The civils (sic) work for the new junction will be complete by Good Friday. Following that there will be testing and commissioning of the signals over the Easter weekend and I have issued firm instructions to ensure that this timetable is met.”