Massive sewage failure at Seafield - beach and water warning

Discussion and debate on the issues affecting Portobello
slvrpe
Posts: 25
Joined: 30 Sep 2006, 22:53
Location: Portobello

Massive sewage failure at Seafield - beach and water warning

Post by slvrpe » 21 Apr 2007, 19:57

:shock: Just been down to Porty beach and there's a few very pathetic signs up stating that the water may be unsafe and to avoid the beach !

Yikes - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edi ... 580253.stm

EDIT: Have moved this topic to the "Portobello Matters" forum, and split out the less serious stuff to http://forum.talkporty.org/viewtopic.php?t=3511 - wangi

User avatar
Poppy
Posts: 3483
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 12:02

Post by Poppy » 21 Apr 2007, 20:38

:shock: I hope the doggies that were swimming today read that. And the folk who were swimming yesterday evening! :?

User avatar
SoupDragon
Posts: 2201
Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02

Post by SoupDragon » 21 Apr 2007, 21:01

Ah just like the good old days!

Well then no skinny dipping for me tonight

slvrpe
Posts: 25
Joined: 30 Sep 2006, 22:53
Location: Portobello

Post by slvrpe » 21 Apr 2007, 21:13

I remember the good old days too - when you'd find a little more than just shells on the beach :shock:

User avatar
SoupDragon
Posts: 2201
Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02

Post by SoupDragon » 21 Apr 2007, 21:22

Yeah, we were banned from going in the water when I was wee.
Not that it stopped us

User avatar
SoupDragon
Posts: 2201
Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02

Post by SoupDragon » 21 Apr 2007, 22:13

Heard the sewage spill mentioned on the Radio 4 10 o'clock bulletin



Didn't know the sewage works were owned by Thames water until today.

slvrpe
Posts: 25
Joined: 30 Sep 2006, 22:53
Location: Portobello

Post by slvrpe » 22 Apr 2007, 09:49

Seems it was quite a major spill ----- 100 million litres of sewage, pretty disgusting eh :x :shock: :x :shock:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edi ... 580253.stm

User avatar
ali
Posts: 846
Joined: 15 Jun 2003, 09:15

Post by ali » 22 Apr 2007, 10:05

according to the radio scotland news at 10.00 am 1000 litres of ordure every second since 4.30 on friday afternoon!!!!!!

User avatar
Maria
Posts: 4795
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 19:41
Location: Portobello
Contact:

Post by Maria » 22 Apr 2007, 10:11

Poppy wrote::shock: I hope the doggies that were swimming today read that. And the folk who were swimming yesterday evening! :?
Ali wrote:1000 litres of ordure every second since 4.30 on friday afternoon!!!!!!
I'm glad I wasn't one of those swimming on Friday night :pale: :pukeright:

User avatar
wangi
[admin]
Posts: 3442
Joined: 27 May 2004, 10:37
Contact:

Post by wangi » 22 Apr 2007, 15:24

Hate to be a "party pooper"... but the outfall is still being filtered at least, so there shouldn't be any floaters!

Everything you ever wanted to know about Seafield: http://www.lifesciences.napier.ac.uk/sm ... afield.htm

User avatar
Poppy
Posts: 3483
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 12:02

Post by Poppy » 22 Apr 2007, 17:18

There are chaps in yellow jackets patrolling the beach today.

And Plug and I were amused when the R2 newsreader called it the "Forth of Firth" :roll: A recent bulletin announced that only 200 litres a second are now spewing forth!! That's a relief! :roll: :roll:

User avatar
Bob Jefferson
Posts: 6212
Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
Location: Planet Porty
Contact:

Post by Bob Jefferson » 22 Apr 2007, 18:44


User avatar
bearcub
Posts: 1057
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 22:51
Location: Marlborough Street

Post by bearcub » 22 Apr 2007, 19:53

Poppy wrote:There are chaps in yellow jackets patrolling the beach today.
Pit-crew for the big race. :D

User avatar
arachnid
Posts: 1291
Joined: 10 Jul 2005, 22:33
Location: Linlithgow

Post by arachnid » 22 Apr 2007, 19:57

It's just been on both local and national news!!! :shock:
Think it could now be called the Filth of Forth!!! :wink:
Why be scared????

StarVanMan
Posts: 42
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 20:28

Post by StarVanMan » 22 Apr 2007, 22:14

I was quite peeved about the incident until I read some of these postings. Cheered me up a bit. Are you all in PR for Scottish/Thames Water? If not, where is all this this "the beach is crap and we like it that way" coming from?

Thought the notices on the prom went up late and are pretty hard to spot. Consequently, I was paddling with my toddler on Saturday afternoon. Still nothing on the the Scottish Water website or the Councils' either.

Maybe i'm posting to the wrong forum here as everyone is clearing enjoying themselves! Glad if someone can help me out if i am.

User avatar
Maria
Posts: 4795
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 19:41
Location: Portobello
Contact:

Post by Maria » 22 Apr 2007, 22:39

Don't think anyone is happy about the situation StarVanMan. I certainly would be pretty angry if I thought my child's health was at risk because of the inadequate warnings. Please put some of the responses down to our rather black sense of humour and welcome to talkporty.

StarVanMan
Posts: 42
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 20:28

Post by StarVanMan » 22 Apr 2007, 23:15

i spoke to one of the officials on the prom this evening, Director Environmental services i think. nice enough chap but he was a bit vauge about when they first sent out their warnings, saying they were now upping their effort. not much sign of a clear plan in place.

on the other side of the coin, does anyone know the real risks from this sort of thing. Sounds grim enough but maybe the council acted slowly at first beause they know the risks are actually pretty small?

User avatar
Poppy
Posts: 3483
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 12:02

Post by Poppy » 22 Apr 2007, 23:24

SVM, I wonder if you are right? The news reports on TV and radio certainly don't report that there is mesh to stop "solid matter" ( :roll: ) and that the effluent is very diluted (if one is to believe what I read i the SoS today).

Living only yards from the beach, I can report there is no smell just now - and I'm used to getting a whiff occasionally from what I can only assume is that pipe from the baths. There was a pong on Friday, but nothing today when I was walking from Pittville Street to Bath Street this morning.

rapunzell
Posts: 1173
Joined: 30 Sep 2005, 12:58
Location: by the prom
Contact:

Post by rapunzell » 23 Apr 2007, 00:24

The basic risks from raw sewage spills are: worms, skin infections, gastroenteritis, eye infections, but they all need direct contact with, ingestion of or immersion in quite strongly contaminated water. Immediate thorough washing is usually enough to avoid trouble though.

User avatar
Poppy
Posts: 3483
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 12:02

Post by Poppy » 23 Apr 2007, 06:49

rapunzell wrote:The basic risks from raw sewage spills are: worms, skin infections, gastroenteritis, eye infections, but they all need direct contact with, ingestion of or immersion in quite strongly contaminated water. Immediate thorough washing is usually enough to avoid trouble though.
E coli too from what I heard in one news report?

User avatar
Pal of Porty
Posts: 2136
Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
Location: Old Folks Home
Contact:

Post by Pal of Porty » 23 Apr 2007, 09:35

Poppy wrote:E coli too from what I heard in one news report?
Absolutely. :(
Justice delayed is justice denied.

User avatar
wangi
[admin]
Posts: 3442
Joined: 27 May 2004, 10:37
Contact:

Post by wangi » 23 Apr 2007, 09:54

An interesting quote in a comment in an article from The Scotsman:

http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=621342007
15. Navvy / 4:08am 23 Apr 2007
The excellent Scotsman has now supplied much more detail than the BBC
"A large 10m-long, 1.5m-diameter screw pump failed in the onsite pumping station at Seafield Wastewater Treatment Works. "

This type of pump has been used in sewage treatment works for many years.
They are simple consisting of a submerged lower bearing, a long screw and an upper bearing and electric drive motor. They are very robust and can pump solids such as nappies, pads and even dead dogs. Generally they sit in an open concrete channel, though the channel might be covered these days. They are used to pump the incoming raw sewage which arrives at a low level because the incoming sewer is below street level, to a higher level to allow gravity flow in the treatment plant.

It sounds as though there is a problem with the bottom bearing because it was mentioned on one news site that they needed to pump out the well.

If the sewage has to be diverted then it goes through a mechanical screen to remove the nappies. I doubt turds will be removed but they will probably be broken up.

Since the pump only serves part of Edinburgh's sewage then the net result to the Firth will be going back some years
to before Seafield was commissioned. I remember sailing on the Firth in the late 60s and seeing turds floating around. We never got sick then so I imagine that the risk is very low. In those days the sludge derived from the treatment was taken by the good ship Gardyloo and dumped off the Isle of May

My advice is not to panic. It is possible to have a spare pump fully set up. This would require a large area and mmore channels, gates and valves withing the plant.

The question to ask is how are these pumps normally maintained. What happens when one is taken out of service for planned maintenance? Where does the sh-one-t go then?

pitoreskni
Posts: 6
Joined: 11 Oct 2006, 09:34
Location: Portobello

Post by pitoreskni » 23 Apr 2007, 12:37

Just been out on the beach with my dog Milo. I wasn't aware of the situation as I was away at the weekend. There were a couple of environmental wardens leaning on the fence at the part of the prom next to the 5 a side pitches. Didn't say anything to me as I walked past with the dog. While I was on the beach with Milo one came running up to me and handed me the yellow notice. When I asked when it happened he told me Friday but didn't bother to give me any details (and the yellow notices aren't very detailed either). I noticed a couple of press photographers taking their photos as they handed out notices so perhaps that was why they were so speedy at informing me all of a sudden? There was a woman walking along the shore with her baby in a buggy and her springer spaniel running in and out of the water. They left after the wardens gave them the notice so I hope they didn't get contaminated!

Still no other notices beyond the yellow A4 sheets on lamp posts and notice boards. I think they should be putting up more noticeable signs to be honest.

User avatar
Sandra
Posts: 3376
Joined: 17 Nov 2003, 16:50
Location: Portobello

Post by Sandra » 23 Apr 2007, 17:10

Beach is very deserted this afternoon. I think most people now know about sewage leak due to press publicity though.

User avatar
Bob Jefferson
Posts: 6212
Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
Location: Planet Porty
Contact:

Post by Bob Jefferson » 23 Apr 2007, 19:18

From Lawrence Marshall, a briefing to councillors on the matter:
Failure of pumping equipment at Seafield Waste Water Treatment Plant

We were notified at 5.10pm on Friday that there had been a failure of the pumping equipment at Seafield Wastewater Treatment Plant. We reported the matter to to the relevant enforcement agency, SEPA, at approximately 5.30pm.

We had been informed that work was underway to resolve the failure of the equipment and that updates would be provided as to Scottish Water and Thames Water’s progress with this matter. As a positive response, the Community Safety Night Time Team erected precautionary warning notices in the Portobello area to advise members of the public to avoid contact with the water, to refrain from removing any items from the water or shoreline and to adopt strict handwashing procedures after being in the area. The notices were erected in this location due to the information received from Thames Water that there had been a failure at Albion Road.

Environmental Wardens were briefed and were on site to erect further notices and provide face to face briefings at 8am on Saturday morning. The Council also undertook to clarify the exact source of the failure and did so with Scottish Water and Thames Water throughout Saturday morning.

We were fully appraised of the specific source of the mechanical failure and emergency outfall at Albert Road on Saturday as there had been a miscommunication of the specific source. In addition, at this time Thames Water indicated that further investigations on site had revealed that there had been a catastrophic failure and that the situation was more serious than had been earlier assessed.

Throughout the course of Saturday additional officers were called in and provided face to face public health advice to residents and visitors along the full length of the shoreline in Edinburgh. Our advice is for people to avoid themselves or their pets coming into contact with the water and not to remoe any items from the water, including stones, shells, fish and any shellfish.

Additional warning notices were erected – approximately 100 in total.

Confirmation was provided that SEPA had contacted Fife Council and officers from Edinburgh contacted East Lothian Council’s emergency officers. In addition, the Council Leader, Chief Executive and two local elected members were briefed as to the ongoing situation.

In addition, a press statement was prepared and agreed and then disseminated to the general media.

Approximately 40 officers were on site from 6.30am to 9.00pm yesterday.

We are convening a key stakeholders’ meeting at 12 noon at our request at the Seafield Wastewater Treatment Plant with representatives from Scottish Water, Thames Water, relevant councils, Forth Ports, SEPA, the FSA and the Harbour Master.
Last edited by Bob Jefferson on 23 Apr 2007, 19:30, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bob Jefferson
Posts: 6212
Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
Location: Planet Porty
Contact:

Post by Bob Jefferson » 23 Apr 2007, 19:23

And a subsequent update:
Update re: Failure of pumping equipment at Seafield Waste Water Treatment Plant

The flow of untreated sewage into the Forth was successfully halted at 10am this morning with suitable replacement pumps being put in place. The sewage is now going through the treatment plant at Seafield.

The works are of a temporary nature until such time as full replacements can be procured and installed by Thames Water, the operator of the plant.

The Council has been informed by SEPA, the relevant enforcement agency in situations relating to sewage disposal, that they have started taking water samples to identify the level of contamination along the Forth Estuary coastline and this work will include samples from Cramond, Silverknowes, Portobello West and Portobello Central. The sampling process will determine whether human pathogens are still present in the water. Further samples will be taken from boat samples in the middle of the Firth to assess the bacteriological quality of the water. The Council will also be undertaking sampling along Edinburgh’s coastline to ensure that a comprehensive set of results is available.

It will take a few days before these results are known and during that time it is advised that a precautionary principle is adopted that risk could occur, rather than take any chance that the water is safe.

Further work is also being undertaken by SEPA and the FSA in relation to the dispersal model for the quantity of sewage which escaped, matched against the tidal patterns and this work will let us know how long it will take until sewage is naturally removed and the water is back to its normal standard.

The Council has been advised by the Health Protection Agency that the approach it took was correct and consistent with good practice in protecting the public health and has been advised to continue with this due diligence until the water is given the all clear.

To this end, the Council will continue to erect signs (of a more permanent nature) and continue with a presence at Cramond, Silverknowes, Portobello West and Portobello Central to advise members of the public.

The FSA has issued a Food Hazard Warning advising that all fish and shellfish caught or harvested in the Firth of Forth from Friday should be treated as being potentially contaminated.

The Council will continue to re-emphasise to the public that there may be a continued risk to visitors to the beach or people participating in water sports that contamination could occur. This advice will be issued through regular press briefings and updates on the Council’s website if necessary.

User avatar
Bob Jefferson
Posts: 6212
Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
Location: Planet Porty
Contact:

Post by Bob Jefferson » 23 Apr 2007, 21:24

Lots of media interest in this story. This, from the BBC:

Experts assess huge sewage leak

Sewage spill shoreline deserted

In Pictures

User avatar
wangi
[admin]
Posts: 3442
Joined: 27 May 2004, 10:37
Contact:

Post by wangi » 24 Apr 2007, 00:28

Bob Jefferson wrote:Lots of media interest in this story. This, from the BBC:

In Pictures
Eeek, what an amazingly depressing and bleak set of photos. The "lack of people" is more to do with scale and the weather. As they say, a photo can tell a hundred lies! The beach was suprisingly busy on Saturday, and to a lesser degree Sunday.

How about a bit of colour from around the Seafield works just last week:

Image
http://www.pbase.com/wangi/image/77647866

Image
http://www.pbase.com/wangi/image/77647865

Image
http://www.pbase.com/wangi/image/77647868

And from our "massively polluted" (but looking better than ever) beach tonight:

Image
http://www.pbase.com/wangi/image/77647899

Image
http://www.pbase.com/wangi/image/77647891

No turds in sight, a few remains of what looked like pant liners :pukeright:

User avatar
Porty
Posts: 8514
Joined: 08 Jun 2004, 14:30
Location: Organic Market

Post by Porty » 24 Apr 2007, 09:28

How much stuff has poured out? Last night on newsnight scotland Gordon Brewer saod it was 100 billion tonnes. Surely not?

pitoreskni
Posts: 6
Joined: 11 Oct 2006, 09:34
Location: Portobello

Post by pitoreskni » 24 Apr 2007, 09:41

Porty wrote:How much stuff has poured out? Last night on newsnight scotland Gordon Brewer saod it was 100 billion tonnes. Surely not?
Most media reports suggested around 100 million litres.

Oh, and all those reports about the beach being deserted yesterday. Well, yes, but the weather was a bit rubbish. The sun's out today so I imagine there will be more people about. I will be taking the dog elsewhere for his walks though, but only because I like to let him off-lead and I don't want him running in the sea.

User avatar
SoupDragon
Posts: 2201
Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02

Post by SoupDragon » 24 Apr 2007, 11:05

See theres now bigger notices gone up. Fixed metal on poles
Haven't been down to see what they say yet,

User avatar
Poppy
Posts: 3483
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 12:02

Post by Poppy » 24 Apr 2007, 13:06

SoupDragon wrote:See theres now bigger notices gone up. Fixed metal on poles
Haven't been down to see what they say yet,
Was going to drag myself outside from my sickbed on your behalf, SoupD, but through my binos (which, Marya, TG et al, are used for birdie peeping :twisted: ) I can see that it is PRECAUTIONARY ADVICE re not going into sea, not to take anything off the beach, washing your hands, etc, seeking medical attention if you don't feel well. I can't read what it says about why.

Still, despite all the news on national and local radio and press and the notices, people are walking their doggies and having to be swooped on by chaps in yellow jackets! On Sunday, a man was warned about his young child playing at the water's edge ... but he did NOTHING just let her carry on pn the beach even though she'd been picking stuff up!! The council chap's body language was eloquent!

User avatar
Bob Jefferson
Posts: 6212
Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
Location: Planet Porty
Contact:

Post by Bob Jefferson » 24 Apr 2007, 17:05

From Scottish Water:
Media Release
23 April 2007

For Immediate Release

Seafield Waste Water Works - Update

The flow of screened sewage from Seafield Waste Water Treatment Works into the Forth has now stopped as temporary pumps have now been successfully fitted.

Seafield is owned and operated by Thames Water under contract to Scottish Water.

Waste water is now being treated on site as teams continue to work with Council Environmental Health and SEPA following a major failure of a waste water pump on Friday 20 April.

Flows into the Forth were screened as Thames used emergency overflow facilities. These are designed to protect the public. The flows into Seafield cannot be stopped without causing problems for the City and the emergency overflow was used under agreed procedures with SEPA after a failure of equipment. The partially treated waste water was discharged into the Forth. This is in line with UK practice.

This removed solids and meant waste water flows would dilute more effectively when entering the Forth. This avoided the alternative of putting sewage flows onto the streets which was not an option.

Staff from Thames Water, who operate the site, have been working relentlessly throughout the weekend. Seafield Waste Water Treatment Works is the largest treatment centre in Edinburgh. In order to cope with the volume of flows entering the system, the type of pumps used, are immense in size.

The temporary pumps now in place with teams of engineers working round the clock to install these vital pieces of equipment.

John Rae, General Manager for Customer Operations said: “We apologise to customers for this incident. The focus has been to get these repairs made and stop the flow of sewage as quickly as possible.

“We have been liaising with City of Edinburgh Council Environmental Health and SEPA throughout and this will continue until this incident is fully resolved.”

We will be asking Thames Water to carry out a full inquiry and give us a full report on the results.

Customers wanting more information can contact Scottish Water Customer Helpline on 0845 600 8855.

User avatar
SoupDragon
Posts: 2201
Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02

Post by SoupDragon » 24 Apr 2007, 18:47

Thanks Poppy I took a walk to see what they said.
There a certainly a lot more noticeable
But I still saw a group of about 4 people at the waters edge putting their hands in the sea.
Maybe they're students who want to be let off exams due to D+V


Basically don't eat the sand , don't drink the water

Ps sorry you're feeling poorly Poppy

User avatar
Poppy
Posts: 3483
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 12:02

Post by Poppy » 24 Apr 2007, 19:09

SoupDragon wrote:Thanks Poppy I took a walk to see what they said.
There a certainly a lot more noticeable
But I still saw a group of about 4 people at the waters edge putting their hands in the sea.
Maybe they're students who want to be let off exams due to D+V
Basically don't eat the sand , don't drink the water
Ps sorry you're feeling poorly Poppy
There are some strange people about - if they are told not to do something they'll do it!!!

Feeling a bit better, thanks, SoupD - I've not been eating the sand or drinking the water! "Just" the old sinuses playing up with all the tree pollen... :cry:


PS How's the page got too wide???

Post Reply