Provision for skateboarders in Portobello
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
Provision for skateboarders in Portobello
Not forgetting in-line skaters and bmx kids. Hundreds of local kids would appreciate this type of facility. It might keep some of them out of trouble. A state of the art facility would cost around £80k. Money well spent?
Re: Provision for skateboarders in Portobello
If this level of support and appreciation could be demonstrated, then it seems a worthy investment.Bob Jefferson wrote:Not forgetting in-line skaters and bmx kids. Hundreds of local kids would appreciate this type of facility.
You are overstating the number of kids that are causing troubleBob Jefferson wrote: It might keep some of them out of trouble.
If it can be established that the facility will be well used then £80,000 seems like good value. Where were you thinking of siting the Skatepark? What options are there?Bob Jefferson wrote: A state of the art facility would cost around £80k. Money well spent?
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
The old tennis courts in Rosefield Park has been suggested as one possible site, though I would anticipate a certain degree of opposition from local residents wherever it goes. One of the advantages of Rosefield Park is the CCTV coverage.
Other possibilities include Joppa Quarry Park and Figgate Park. Discussions are also ongoing as to whether the disused tennis courts at PHS could be used to site one or more of these facilites and to operate as an 'open playground' in the evening.
Other possibilities include Joppa Quarry Park and Figgate Park. Discussions are also ongoing as to whether the disused tennis courts at PHS could be used to site one or more of these facilites and to operate as an 'open playground' in the evening.
That's probably an unsitable site. If you've followed the tale of the Edinburgh-wide skatepark St. Mark's Park in Powderhall was their preferred location. However it had been used as landfill in the past making the building of such a structure unsuitable. I'd imagine JQP will have a certain amount of infill too (certainly looking at aerial maps it's "confused").Bob Jefferson wrote:Joppa Quarry Park
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
I took another look at the data. 13% of the kids made a skateboard park their first choice. Assuming a school roll of 1450 that would equate to around 188 hard-core skaters. A further 17% made it their second choice, another 247 kids.From what I can gather, the survey gave each kid 10 points to allocate to 4 chioices. Cafe/Club, Shelter, 5-a-side/basketball and a Skatepark. They allocated ponits 4,3,2,1, with 4 being awarded to their most favoured choice. This means that every option was guaranteed at least 10% of the vote, as each kid had to vote at least 1 point for that option. So with 558 kids voting ; had "Being kept in all summer and thrashed every morning" been one of the four options, it would have got at least 558 points; 10% of the vote
Skatepark got 997 points, 558 kids voted so it only attracted 439 points more than the minimum. There were 3226 "floating" points available to be divvied up among the 4 options. That means that skatepark attracted 439/3226 of floating points or 13%. It was least favourite by miles. You cannot use this survey as justification for a skatepark. (there may be other evidence and I'm not saying a skatepark is not justifiedb but you can't go on this survey.)
You suggested the survey demonstrated that at least 315 kids were into skateboarding, that's nonsense. All 558 kids were forced to "vote for" a skatepark.
I think that it is fair to interpret from this that around 435 kids from PHS would appreciate a skateboard park, and perhaps more if we think of it in terms of a 'wheels arena'. There is strong support for a 'sports arena' as well and ideally it would be great to have both these facilities in Portobello, but if we had to choose between the two then the 'sports arena' was more popular and represents better value for money. A youth club or café is more problematic because it has to be staffed and there are ongoing costs. Youth shelters are cheap - the problem is simply where to site them.
I still have the questionnaires. If anyone has an hour or two to spare and would like to look over them they are very welcome.
I still don't think its valid. The survey sample was skewed towards 1st and 2nd year so it can't be taken as representative of the whole school.
Also, the choice of activities and facilities was fixed before the survey took place. A claustrophobic who dislikes ball games would have been drawn to chose a Skatepark, whether he/she had been on a skateboard or not.
Another interpretation would be that 87% of kids made it clear that a Skatepark was not their 1st choice. I can't see how that stat puts a Skatepark before the 3 other facilities, none of which exist. This survey quite clearly states that a Skatepark is the least wanted facility.
996 points from 558 kids is an average of 1.79 points out of 10, hardly persuasive numbers when one was guaranteed 1 out of 10 at the outset.
BTW I had a look at Mount Lodge swing park and I think it would suit a Skatepark and so would the swing park area at Joppa Quarry. Mind you, Ive never seen a skatepark.
Also, the choice of activities and facilities was fixed before the survey took place. A claustrophobic who dislikes ball games would have been drawn to chose a Skatepark, whether he/she had been on a skateboard or not.
Another interpretation would be that 87% of kids made it clear that a Skatepark was not their 1st choice. I can't see how that stat puts a Skatepark before the 3 other facilities, none of which exist. This survey quite clearly states that a Skatepark is the least wanted facility.
996 points from 558 kids is an average of 1.79 points out of 10, hardly persuasive numbers when one was guaranteed 1 out of 10 at the outset.
BTW I had a look at Mount Lodge swing park and I think it would suit a Skatepark and so would the swing park area at Joppa Quarry. Mind you, Ive never seen a skatepark.
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
I'm not talking it down. I'm challenging the survey which you cite as being evidence that Kids want a Skatepark more than any the other of the facilities mentioned. When in actual fact its the least desirable to them. 87% chose an alternative to a SP as their first choice. That is not me talking nor is it my opinion, it is the result of the survey.Bob Jefferson wrote: So what's your motive in talking it down?
As for statistical interpretation? I defy anyone to come up with a stat fom that survey which supports a Skatepark before a Cafe/Club, Shelter or Sports Arena.
It is you that talking it up on the basis that "you think it would be great". Which is more or less the same basis as the Bandstand campaign. I'm not against either project, however i am being devils advocate.
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
- Pal of Porty
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
- Location: Old Folks Home
- Contact:
Bob Jefferson wrote:I have never made this claim and, on the evidence, clearly I would be bonkers to do so.Porty wrote:I'm not talking it down. I'm challenging the survey which you cite as being evidence that Kids want a Skatepark more than any the other of the facilities mentioned.
Technically correct but you have admitted talking the idea up using the survey as a basis. Which effectively seeks to prioritise a skatepark over the other facilities. It amounts to the same thing.
If you are serious about not being perceived as bonkers, may i suggest that you refrain from making statements such as " a bandstand will benefit the whole community".
skatepark
very interesting thread. i, for one, think that portobello is very well suited for a skatepark on this side of the city.
as far as i am aware, the council has a fair amount of money already in place for a skatepark and have been talking about situating it in the meadows or inverleith park (ie they are not taking it seriously and looking at areas where residents commitees are going to opposed).
a few organisations already exist to put pressure on the council to get the thing built. i am not a skateboarder, i just dislike the council trying to kill off a sporting activity because it is viewed as anti-social among certain groups.
http://www.edinburghskatepark.org.uk/
http://www.skateboardscotland.com/index.php[/url]
as far as i am aware, the council has a fair amount of money already in place for a skatepark and have been talking about situating it in the meadows or inverleith park (ie they are not taking it seriously and looking at areas where residents commitees are going to opposed).
a few organisations already exist to put pressure on the council to get the thing built. i am not a skateboarder, i just dislike the council trying to kill off a sporting activity because it is viewed as anti-social among certain groups.
http://www.edinburghskatepark.org.uk/
http://www.skateboardscotland.com/index.php[/url]
Believe me we've tried! Not only for a skateboard park, but ANYTHING that would be of benefit to local teenagers. Unfortunately we've had no success for various reasons.Izzie wrote:Two things spring to mind
Have the youths been asked if they would use it.Also can the CC not help with this.
Or is there anyone that can help the youths with this.
Sorry that was three.![]()
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!
-
Cleopas
I have learned that Porty, historically, was supposed to be the home of daytime entertainment in Edinburgh, eg; shows, arcades, pools, beach sports and games, etc. I think a skateboard park, a trampoline centre, a theatre, a cinema, pool halls, everything to do with having FUN, should be centred here!
I think getting the franchise for casinos and other similar business interests in this line, would attract more money into the area to build on what used to be.
Why does the community not get together and push Porty positively for all it's worth?
A skateboard park is only the beginning ...
"Anarchy is a wonderful state of mind"
I think getting the franchise for casinos and other similar business interests in this line, would attract more money into the area to build on what used to be.
Why does the community not get together and push Porty positively for all it's worth?
A skateboard park is only the beginning ...
"Anarchy is a wonderful state of mind"
As an anarchist - who by definition is a revolutionary socialist bitterly opposed to capitalism and profiteering - do you think that other anarchists might have cause to question the politics of this statement?Cleopas wrote:I think getting the franchise for casinos and other similar business interests in this line, would attract more money into the area
- Bob Jefferson
- Posts: 6212
- Joined: 11 Dec 2004, 21:16
- Location: Planet Porty
- Contact:
Great news for the west side of the city - not a lot of use to Porty kids though. A more central location, like the Meadows or Inverleith Park, could have served the whole city. Failing that, I would like to see an equivalent facility at the new Meadowbank, or Portobello, for this end of town.
There is going to be a big gap in the NW Portobello Masterplan if the library and community centre are re-developed onsite, which is what local people seem to want, and something like this would be a great asset.
There is going to be a big gap in the NW Portobello Masterplan if the library and community centre are re-developed onsite, which is what local people seem to want, and something like this would be a great asset.